I knew I was following @warrenellis for a reason.
This morning he linked to a fantastic review of the next Transformers installment:
Michael Bay Finally Made An Art Movie
Imagine that you went back in time to the late 1960s and found Terry Gilliam, fresh from doing his weird low-fi collage/animations for Monty Python. You proceeded to inject Gilliam with so many steroids his penis shrank to the size of a hair follicle, and you smushed a dozen tabs of LSD under his tongue. And then you gave him the GDP of a few sub-Saharan countries. Gilliam might have made a movie not unlike this one.
I'm reminded of
rabbit1080's thesis that the second matrix film is actually a ballet.
This morning he linked to a fantastic review of the next Transformers installment:
Michael Bay Finally Made An Art Movie
Imagine that you went back in time to the late 1960s and found Terry Gilliam, fresh from doing his weird low-fi collage/animations for Monty Python. You proceeded to inject Gilliam with so many steroids his penis shrank to the size of a hair follicle, and you smushed a dozen tabs of LSD under his tongue. And then you gave him the GDP of a few sub-Saharan countries. Gilliam might have made a movie not unlike this one.
I'm reminded of


Comments
Best Review EVAR
(although even that concept may be too precise for either film)
Actually that's why I like all of the Michael Bay films that I like.
(Looks at watch, waits for
Maybe if Transformers: ROTFL flops badly enough, maybe Bay will no longer be given carte blanche and blank cheques for any future movies, and will have to go back to making films that make some sort of sense.
And oh my god Transformers sucked bad. How bad? Not even I would defend it.
Must admit, the bit from the Transformers review that I found most encouraging was the comparison to Speed Racer - I quite enjoyed having my visual cortex demolished by the latter experience.